Unfortunately, Kelly deals from a stacked deck. For most of this issue, Superman is behind the curve. He shows up too late to stop one threat; he gets trounced by another before the Elite come in to save the day. When he does stop a threat, the Elite’s leader, Manchester Black, berates him for his solution being a temporary stop-gap as opposed to fixing the problem permanently. This all culminates in a showdown between Superman and the Elite, and at first they wipe the floor with Superman, seemingly obliterating him. Only they didn’t, because right when the Elite appear triumphant, Superman takes them all out with shocking efficiency. Which begs the question: if Superman was that good all along, why did he get his ass kicked for the previous 30-plus pages?
The problem is that Kelly’s argument basically boils down to “Superman is better than the Authority because . . . he’s Superman.” But an argument is, as the philosopher Monty of Python once said, “a connected series of statements intended to establish a proposition. It isn’t just contradiction.” Kelly spends his time contrasting, but that in itself doesn’t prove why one is better than the other. The closest he comes is when he deals with the topic of killing. Superman’s belief that all life is sacred is certainly a core value, and seemingly diametrically opposed to the Elite’s nonchalant attitude towards killing. But there really isn’t any meaningful discussion of the merits or faults of either viewpoint. Kelly pokes a little around the edges of it a little, using the example of the children who wanted to pretend to be a member of the Elite because it would be “fun to kill bad guys”, but he never gets into the nitty-gritty of discussing the point/counter-point of when is killing justified.
Now, perhaps Action Comics is not the place to begin a frank philosophical discussion on such a topic. But if this issue is Kelly’s answer to the question of whether Superman’s values still mean something in our jaded 21st century world, why couldn’t he have shown us why instead of just saying “it does”? Why couldn’t we see Superman struggling against the Elite, rallying due to his inner strength, or outsmarting them by tricking them into a scenario where their philosophy backfires? Superman beats the Elite by . . . well, not holding back. Kelly plays this off as something noble—Superman can be cruel and relentless but his superior morality means he doesn’t have to. And yet, with both Tripoli and Tokyo devastated by some truly awesome threats, I can only wonder: if Superman is as powerful as the Elite, and can be as ruthless when the need arrives, why couldn’t he have done it sooner and maybe saved civilians on the collateral damage? Why not take out the Elite as soon as they start fighting? That Superman beats the Elite by tricking them, humiliating them in front of a global audience and then gloats about how much better he is just makes Superman look like . . . like the Elite.
Next Issue: It’s my final post about Superman comics . . . for a little while, anyway. Joe Kelly takes another swing at explaining what makes Superman so great, I take a look at what Superman is like in 2011, and then feel the spirit of ’76, Elseworlds-style.
No comments:
Post a Comment